Another wish of Allama Jawad Naqvi: No democracy, we need a military system!

Shiite News: Head of the Tehreek-e-Bidaari Ummat Mustafa and the rector of Jamia Urwat al-Wathiqa Lahore, Allama Jawad Naqvi, once again gave voice to the desires of his heart.

While talking in Ahmed Fozan’s podcast, Allama Jawad Naqvi once again expressed his heartfelt desire with great intensity.

He has said as an argument that democracy is the worst way, experiences in seventy-six years of history have told us.

He said that if you do not implement a divine system, then a military democracy is better than this popular democracy.

He explained the argument for the improvement of military democracy and said that there is no corruption in military democracy, the army chief will come directly to the government, otherwise it will happen that a servant of this league will also come, a servant of this party will also come, you will just keep experimenting with everyone and destroying the country, so it is better to hand it over to them, because when they have the power, they also do not have the resources.

Liberal democracy, popular democracy is not a Quranic system. When you have created this system yourself, it is better to create a military democracy, the army can run the country better than them.

It is certain that when you cannot create a divine system, there are obstacles, you do not have its resources, there is no curriculum, there is no preparation, there is no ideology, but you have to form the government, right? So you should see which system gives a better result.

He further stated the virtues of military democracy and said that the discussion that the army replaces democracy is a big crime, where is the crime?

To further strengthen his argument, Allama Jawad Naqvi gave the example of the government of Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman and said that there is no democracy there, but the results are good, right?

It should be noted that Allama Syed Jawad Naqvi has been supporting military dictatorship over democracy for a long time.

His critics say that all this is the effect of the favors that have been going on for a long time, while in the case of providing Madrasa Boards, sometimes in the case of access to government institutions.